As we close in on the year 2013, it is amazing to look back to the previous years of progress we have made in healthcare technology. Modern science has brought us to a whole new realm of thinking in just one generation. Across the board, we have seen advances in pharmaceuticals, knowledge of disease processes, and inventions of medical tools that I thought I would never live to see. Healthcare always seems to be in a state of change, right? But, what kind of change is acceptable?
This is a brief synopsis of current ideas being brought into the forefront:
Healthcare Finance News, July 26, 2012
Telemedicine and mHealth have the potential to help the healthcare system meet the Institute of Healthcare Improvement’s triple aim to simultaneously increase the quality of care, improve the health of populations and reduce the per capita cost of care.
“A 2011 study by the National Institute for Health Care Reform found that hospital readmissions within a month of discharge have cost over $16 billion each year. Telemedicine can be used to reduce readmissions and other adverse events at a cost that is less than the cost of the problems themselves.”
Telemedicine and mHealth have the potential to help the healthcare system meet the Institute of Healthcare Improvement’s triple aim to simultaneously increase the quality of care, improve the health of populations and reduce the per capita cost of care.
So, what does this have to do with end of life care? Believe it or not, Telemedicine has entered the hospice field. Currently, there are several agencies using this technology for end of life. The University of Kansas Medical Center and Michigan State University launched a bi-state project called “Telehospice: Using Telecommunication Technology for Terminally Ill Patients.” Overall, from the study completed by Pamela Whitten, Gary Doolittle, and Seth Hellmich, of the 51 patient/caregiver interviews completed, felt that telehospice was “an extension of traditional hospice services.” Providing telehospice to traditional hospice care especially to those patients in rural areas offers several benefits:
- It could greatly relieve time constraints in travel by the clinicians.
- Increase communication between clinician, patient, and caregivers.
- After hour’s acute symptom management, video visits offers confirmation if a face to face visit is needed. As well as emotional support to anxious patients and caregivers.
- Providing at home triage services, telemedicine appointments, telemonitoring- a form of observation of the patient.
- Reduces unnecessary Emergency Room visits.
- Corporately, telemedicine offers fractional employment. Then in turn, reduces system costs by enabling patients to receive care at a lower price point.
Telehospice. So, are we there yet? Who is to say? It is definitely a debatable point. Traditional hospice was built on the foundation of serving patients with compassion and mercy, meeting with them face to face in their home, alleviating pain, offering spiritual, emotional, and bereavement support. Do we leave this belief system for a new innovative healthcare invention that could leave patients feeling deserted by their providers and not feeling connected to those giving the care? Is this kind of change acceptable? You decide………….







